|
Crossing the Columbia River - The Early Days
Colleen Bauman - Clark County History
1988 - Published by Fort Vancouver Historical Society of Clark County- With
permission from Clark County Historical Museum
In the early years
of exploration and settlement of the Pacific Northwest, rivers - in particular,
the Columbia - were a vital means of transportation. As settlements grew
into towns and cities, and later as railroad and automobile usage grew
in necessity and popularity, the rivers became a frustrating obstacle
- a break in the chain of road systems linking one city with another.
In such a remote
isolated area of North America, far away from modern technology of the
time and with transportation of building supplies from the East an impossibility
at that time, bridges were out of the question. Ferryboats - hand and
river powered or motorized - became floating extensions of man's route
to his destination.
Ferries Enjoy
Monopoly
Long before auto
and rail and long before even the Hudson's Bay Co. and its nearby settlements
had a need for any regular sort of ferrying system across the Columbia,
Indians had criss-crossed it for centuries. Carrying in their dugout canoes
varied cargo such as berries, fish, fibers, and skins - they traded up,
down, and across the Columbia. Elk hides were ferried across, traded and
manufactured into skin armor and worn to protect their proud owners from
enemy missiles.
Human slave "cargo"
were imported from as far south as California and were forced to ferry
their owners across the river and were traded as far north as the Queen
Charlotte Islands.
Because of their
importance in conquering the rivers, canoes became a sign of class distinction.
Upon marrying, a young man gave a canoe to the parents of his prospective
bride. Shamans "ferried" the sick to the other world in order to rescue
their souls from the dead; and after death, people were "ferried" to the
other world in canoes.
At the time of
white contact, Indians often established rates and managed a "business",
also charging their white customers - taking their gold, and later, coin,
which brought them white men's goods for their services. As the settlements
grew, so did the cargo. With precious and weighty flour, sugar, and molasses
sinking a canoe's hull deep into the water, the crossing could be hazardous
-to both the cargo and ferryman- and arduous, especially if the current
were strong and the crossing necessitated paddling against it. Often many
trips or canoes were needed.
The white populace,
concerned for its goods and the dollars they would bring, decided a better
system was needed and stepped in to provide it, much to the chagrin of
the Indians who feared the loss of a profitable means of obtaining white
goods. Downriver from Vancouver, for example, the Chinooks jealously guarded
their monopoly near the mouth of the river, coldly receiving the American
Winship party, who sought in 1810 to establish a trading post some thirty
miles from the Pacific.
The following
year, when the Astorians established their post on the left bank, their
welcome by the Chinooks was anything but enthusiastic. Had they not wanted
manufactured goods the white men brought, the welcome could have been
much cooler. This usurping of the Indian "ferries" by white ferryman became
the rule at Vancouver as well.
In the early
1840s, as American settlers came to the Oregon country, the Hudson's Bay
Co. -serving as agent of the British government - tried to discourage
them from ferrying north into what it regarded as British territory. They
hoped the Columbia River would form the Anglo-American boundary line.
Up until the boundary was established in 1846, the company watched with
growing alarm the American influx which their own boats helped shunt south
across the river to what, for all intents and purposes, the company came
to regard as the American shore.
In 1847, the
American-dominated Oregon Provisional Government's legislative body was
empowered to pass laws for raising revenue either by the levying and collecting
of taxes, or the imposing of licenses on merchandise, ferries, "or other
objects." As ownership of the Columbia was unsettled, the Provisional
Government seemed to have concerned itself primarily with the regulation
of ferryboats on the Willamette. On Sept. 27, 1849, the Oregon Territory
legislature passed "An Act regulating Ferries" authorizing county courts
to grant licenses and establish rates and taxes and the duties of licensees
and penalties for non-compliance. At face value, the thirteen section
document was imposing, but considerable leeway under these laws was possible
depending on the disposition of the county courts. For instance, considerable
variation was possible in the determination of the law specifying a ferryman
to keep "a good tight boat."
Although mention
has been made of supplies ferried in the 1840s from Fort Vancouver across
the Columbia en route to the Willamette Valley - probably on the same
crude log rafts that brought the settlers down from the Dalles and Cascades
- no regular public ferry service was run by a white American until John
Switzler Jr.'s in 1846. Switzer Jr., an 1845 immigrant from Virginia,
settled on his land claim - present day Hayden Island - on the South Bank
of the Columbia River opposite Fort Vancouver on the North Bank in September,
1846.
His first crude
row ferry, probably equipped with a sail, was to carry mainly foot traffic
of Oregonians trading at the HBC post. This ferry was run sporadically
by Mr. Switzler Sr. and his sons for nearly a decade.
Although ferries
on the Columbia should have some under federal regulation, a general act
"of the Regulation of Ferries", passed Jan. 27, 1854, makes no mention
of such a thing. In 1854, The Washington Territory passed an act regulating
governance of such craft. Patterned after the Oregon law, the law would
be changed little over the next several years. Despite provision for local
regulation, the territorial legislature granted many charters establishing
many rates of ferriage - granting eleven authorizations from 1854 to 1859
and nine from 1865 to 1869.
Indeed, as early
as 1850, Mr. Forbes Barclay licensed himself with the government to run
a ferry upriver a short way from Vancouver at what was called the upper
landing at the Indian Village.
On Jan. 19, 1885,
William Ryan was granted a franchise to establish a ferry in the same
area. In 1851, on December 2nd, a license was "granted" to William Goodwin
to establish a ferry from the head of Lady Island to above the mouth of
the Washougal River. Other licenses granted in that period were to David
C. Parker on June 10, 1854, for the same area; James Carty, on Lake River
slough and O.W. Bozorth on the Cathlapoodle - present Lewis River - on
March 7, 1855.
In 1855, with
John Switzler Jr. taking over operation from his father, the Switzler
ferry provided a more regular service for the next several years and was
subject to some of the new licensing and regulations. On Jan. 19, 1885,
a William Ryan was granted a franchise to establish a ferry in the same
area.
On April 5, 1855,
the county commissioners of Multnomah County established the following
rates of ferriage across the Columbia River to Vancouver for the Switzler
operation: "For each foot passenger 50 cents; man and horse $1.00; wagon
and span $2.00; each additional animal 25 cents. Each cart of buggy and
animal, $1.50; each head of horses or cattle 50 cents; each sheep or hog
25 cents; each hundred pounds of freight not on wagon, 25 cents."
For these fees,
Switzler was required to pay $10 per annum. To continue the trip from
Vancouver to Switzler Island it was necessary to take the Love ferry across
the Columbia Slough - also referred to at that time by the paradoxical
name of Love's Slough - to Portland. At that same meeting rates were set
for Lewis Love as follows: "For wagon and animal 25 cents; man on horseback
10 cents; foot passenger 5 cents; loose animals 5 cents." He was required
to pay a fee of $5 a year.
$1.00 for a man
and his team to be ferried across the Columbia and then an additional
25 cents to be ferried across the Slough seems a heavy fee for the times,
but on July 3, 1855, Lewis Love made application for a new schedule of
fees. "Foot passengers 12 cents; horse or mule 12 cents; man on horse
25 cents; wagon and one horse 37 cents; wagon with two horses 50 cents."
It was granted. Only July 31, 1855, John Switzler was allowed $250 for
building a bridge along what was then known as the Columbia Bottoms.
After the Switzlers
quit ferrying, Wesley Van Schuyver ran a service to the Oregon shore,
charging fees of : $1 per person; $3 for man on horseback; $2 for horse,
mule or cow; $3 for horse and wagon; and $6 for a team and wagon. Hogs
and sheep did not carry such a lofty charge at only 24 cents each. Even
at these prices - finding the run unprofitable - he discontinued it in
a few months, after which there was no regular service across the Columbia
at Vancouver for sixteen years.
In 1868, this
lack of regular service was made apparent in the petition signing by some
four hundred tax payers of Multnomah County begging "...their Commissioners
to build a substantial plank road, above high water mark, between Love's
Slough and Switzler's Landing on the Columbia River..." A preliminary
agreement had been signed and entered into "...that a number of property
holders in Vancouver and Clarke County pledge themselves to enter into
bonds to the amount of $2,000, guaranteeing to build and maintain a good
steam ferryboat on the Columbia River, to meet with the plank road, provided
Multnomah County builds said road." "Portland has given bonds to the amount
of $250,000, not because she desires to make a display of her wealth or
liberality, but in a wise consideration of her interests..." "Pleasure
seekers should favor this scheme as it affords a much needed extension
and variety to their present circumscribed limits for driving and pleasure
seeking."
"That Vancouver
will eventually be a point of commercial importance, its peculiarly eligible
situation, backed as it is by an abundance of the finest agricultural
land, no reasonable man will for a moment doubt. Furthermore, the N.P.P.R.
is sure to come down the Columbia, in order to gain the immense trade
of the grain growing valleys of the upper country. Cheap overland travel
helps a country in every way"
During this time
steamboats took most all the traffic from Vancouver up the Willamette
to Portland. As far back as 1850, Vancouver had been port for the little
steamer "Columbia." In 1854, the "Eagle," a little iron propeller boat
of ten tons that had been brought out around the Horn on the deck of a
ship, was placed on the route between Portland and Vancouver. Under the
command of Captain Woods, its fare was five dollars. In 1857, Vancouver
became the terminus of a steamer operating on a regular schedule - the
side-wheeler "Vancouver." Beginning in 1870, and running for nearly a
decade, the "Vancouver" made the run to Portland. She was joined by the
"Wasp," the "Carrie," and "Oneota." Several others were to follow in the
years ahead.
Although the
steamboats were an integral part of Columbia transportation, they were
capable of - and often did - travel to other areas besides the Portland-Vancouver.
They often took passengers and freight up on the Willamette or up the
Columbia to the Dalles or downriver to Astoria for pleasure seeking sightseers.
So, they were not restricted in their usage just to Portland-Vancouver
travel as the ferries and the bridges of the future were. What distinguished
the ferries from the other craft plying up and down the river was the
"crossing over." "To travelers they were never ends in themselves - only
means, but mighty important ones as any trans-Columbia traveler could
have told you."
Along with the
Van Schuyver service, other ferry services died out. For some time, ferries
had proliferated up and down the Columbia, with many men trying to cash
in on the "riches to be made" from providing such a necessary service.
But, the river was treacherous and most crafts were flimsy. A ferryman
had to be quite knowledgeable at what he was doing or lose all, including
the lives of his passengers or his own. Many could not make a go of it.
Also, in many
areas competition was so fierce that feuds flared and sabotage was a rule
- fires, boring of holes, disappearance of caulking, and boulder bombardments
being among the tools of the saboteurs. If there were feuds at Vancouver
or Portland, they were unspectacular ones; several recorded services seem
to have just quietly faded away, probably victims of economics and the
"flooding of the market" of ferry services.
By the 1870s,
with the improvement of rail transport into Portland, there was an increasing
need for a dependable ferry system. In September, 1875, the Independent
reported that a ferry that had "...recently put on a run between the government
wharf and the Oregon shore as a venture was continuing to run, making
hourly trips from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m." On Sept. 13, 1878, the ferry was again
made mention of in that "The ferry boat at Vancouver, tied to the bank,
was sunk by alternation of the tides. Efforts to get it off the bottom
failed due to mishaps. After three days she was raised and towed to Portland
for repairs." For however a short time, the ferry was out of service again.
The Independent doesn't mention whether this ferry was the "Black Maria,"
the first steam ferry to make the crossing. Instead of being steered by
a pilot at a wheel, he stood at the stern with along sweep and guided
the boat. This is probably the same boat, as it went on the run in 1878
and saw only four months of service.
On May 7, 1879,
franchise was granted to William H. Foster and Edwin A. Willis to operate
a steam ferry on the Columbia River from the foot of "B" Street, Vancouver,
to Switzler's Landing, upon the payment of an annual license fee of five
dollars."
Also in 1879,
a more enduring ferry service was put on the run with the "Salem2," purchased
by William Stevens and piloted by his son - Captain Frank Stevens. Captain
Stevens was to be a Vancouver to Portland ferryman for thirty eight years.
In 1880, Captain
W.H. Foster and E. Willis built the "Veto," which operated for two years,
and was then sold to Portland people and placed on the Jefferson Street
run.
By October, the
"Veto 2" - owned by Captain W.H. Foster of Vancouver and J.H. Moore of
Portland - began making runs, piloted by Captain Foster. This craft was
the nearest approach to a real ferry that had been constructed up to that
time, built 90 feet long and nearly 24 feet wide with square stern and
head. It was sold to the company that operated the old steam railway from
the Stark Street ferry landing to the banks of the Columbia opposite the
Vancouver Barracks military reservation. This company's steam railway,
whose cars were replaced with electric cars, carried passengers from Portland
to Vancouver.
This ferry was
constructed in such a manner as to facilitate the growing railways. Until
this time, generally cargo on the ferries had been travelers and their
paraphernalia, wagons, teams, livestock, supplies and buggies. Now came
a need for railcar transport. Although the railway were much desired in
the community, some ferry travelers were not - as the May 27, 1980, Independent
complained of: "...pilfering tramps were coming into Vancouver by the
ferry. They also looked for food; and in a couple of cases 'borrowed'
horses, which they turned loose several miles north of the town."
The "Albina No.
2," which had been operating on the Albina run, was purchased by the railway
company and replaced the "Veto No. 2" in 1883. Traffic in the summer of
this year was very greatly increased over any other season. "It frequently
happens that teams are left on the bank from the boat being filled, and
too small to take them all. A larger boat will have to be put on another
year," reported the Independent of Sept. 13, 1883.
At about this
time, work was scheduled to get underway on a bridge nearly two-thirds
of a mile long across the Columbia bottoms to improve that roadway - a
mess at the best of times, an impassable disaster in high water. Multnomah
County was to pay part of the expense, Clark County was contributing lumber
from the Lucia mills at Vancouver, and financial aid was provided form
the Quartermaster Corps of the Army. Work began in late July and continued
into the early fall. On the Vancouver side, improvements included installation
of plank inclines at the ferry landing, "a very noticeable aid."
But an Independent
writer on Oct. 23, "complained that there had been so many accidents that
the public is losing confidence in the officers and the line. Most recent
mishap was the sinking of the boat at her moorings after a plank had been
damaged or loosened by a snag. Vancouver's new Fire Engine 1 had to be
used to pump water out of the ferry's hold."
On May 5, 1884,
privileges were granted to the Multnomah Railroad Co. to also operate
a ferry from Switzler's Landing to the foot of "B" Street in Vancouver
for the annual license fee of $5. Travel to and from the ferry in 1885
continued at a good rate and was, in fact, too lively. Although less than
a year old, the long bridge on the Columbia bottom was reported "badly
injured" by fast driving. All teamsters were compelled by the road supervisor
to walk their horses over the bridge thenceforth.
It was reported
in the June 21, 1888, Independent that "The Portland & Vancouver Railway
Company...have purchased all the property of the Multnomah Railway Company,
including the Vancouver ferry franchise and the steamer "Albina No. 2,"
paying therefor a sum of $25,000. This was the perpetual ferry right between
the Oregon shore and Vancouver."
In 1888, due
to the increased rail usage and the increased need for more rapid transport
over the river, the first solid rumblings of bridge talk were heard. The
Independent stated that with many enterprising citizens and newcomers
having "...thoroughly awakened Vancouver and endeavoring to tell the rest
of the world that Vancouver is a city of promise ...all sorts of rumors
are afloat. At least seven railroads are planned, and two of these, it
seems sure, will come...as Vancouver is on a direct line with these cities
and Portland and the most available place on the Columbia for a bridge.
A bridge company with a capital of $2,000,000 has been incorporated in
Portland to bridge the Columbia at Vancouver."
Earliest rumors
had begun to fly as early as 1868, as noted in the Vancouver Register
of Dec. 26, 1868. It was reported that at a Fern Prairie meeting, Thomas
J. Fletcher gave quite a speech detailing eight separate reasons why a
bridge should be built in that area rather the Vancouver area crossing.
For example, the channel at the Lady's Island crossing was not so wide
as the Vancouver one; the span across the Slough is not so great as it
is on the Slough at Hayden's Island; and there was "...a huge reef of
rocks midway between the island and the main land, forming almost a natural
pier for a bridge." He challenged any site on the Columbia with their
site, not "...excepting the much vaunted site of Vancouver." He especially
took exception to the railroad's "...using all honorable means to get
the railroad to Vancouver, but we don't think it exactly the clean thing'
to get up a petition asking Congress to grant you a special charter to
build a bridge across the Columbia at Vancouver. This would be all right
as citizens of the place, but, as a railroad company, it is all wrong."
In the summer months of that year and the preceding two, the daily average
travel across the Vancouver ferry by stage and private conveyance had
averaged 132 passengers.
In 1891, the
"old" "Vancouver" was built in Portland for the Portland and Vancouver
Railway Co. and came to Vancouver on Aug. 16, 1893. On July 28, 1899,
the ferry caught fire and burned to the waterline, completely destroying
the deck house. Even though the fire department promptly got the blaze
under control, some $1500 damage was done and the ferry was laid up. On
Aug. 19th, the Independent noted that "...the superintendent of the Portland-Vancouver
Street Car Co. Came to Vancouver personally to thank the fire department
and to present them with $50." On October 5th, the badly burned 157-foot
side-wheeler was taken to Portland for overhauling. The borrowed "Klickitat"
was substituted for carrying the freight and the steamer "Annie" for passengers.
In 1919, the
"City of Vancouver" was built to replace the tired "Vancouver." A 398-ton
side-wheeler - 142 feet in length with a beam depth of 9 feet - she had
the capacity to carry 2,500 passengers and many more teams than formerly.
She was a far cry from even the first steamboat, the iron "Allen," that
was not "...considered safe to trust more than three people on her at
once." "The City of Vancouver' was given a royal welcome by all the steam
whistles along the waterfront."
During the run
of the two "Vancouvers," they landed at the foot of "B" Street - present
day Washington Street - and until 1905, landed nearly ´ mile upstream
on the Oregon side at Columbia Beach.
The ferries were
depended on at all times and in all sorts of weather. If they were unable
to run, a major portion of area transportation was - out of necessity
- put on hold.
In 1880, ferry
service was provided by the "Veto" in the high water of that year, carrying
stock and farmers from flooded lands. Late in the year, a number of runs
of "Veto No. 2" were curbed due to ice in the Columbia. By year's end,
the boat had to quit its runs because of "...the bottom having fallen
out of the road in Oregon, causing the Vancouver-Portland stages to cancel
their trips for the time being."
In 1882, again
high water was causing problems. Because of poor roads and weather, the
"Veto No. 2" had to delay ferry trips, but finally got under way in early
May. On June 1st, the Independent again remarked on the high water of
the season: "The high water that kept wood piles on high ground resulted
in a suspension of ferry trips and of travel on the Vancouver-Portland
road...condition lasted more than a month and possibly longer."
About Christmastime
in 1884, ice was again interfering with "crossing over." The steamboats
were unable to reach Vancouver and the ferry was not making regular trips.
In early January 1885, ice was loose from the shore, but still was more
than a foot thick. One steamer trip was made in mid-January, but the ice
blockade closed in again, so that no stern wheelers could get closer to
Vancouver than a mile above or six miles below and the ferry was also
blocked.
Dec. 21, 1892
- Vancouverites awoke to a foot of snow and the snow continued to fall
in sheets and was blown about by a powerful wind. By evening, eighteen
inches were on the ground and it had not let up and the next day snow
turned to sleet and rain, creating a crust of ice on the snow. On the
river, ice was everywhere and the ferry was able to make only two trips
before being forced to give up and tied up to the Oregon side to await
an open river. By Dec. 28th, the ice and snow had pretty much broken and
melted.
But on Jan. 18,
1893, cold weather again attacked the area and by the 25th, the ferry
was once again dodging ice running in the river. The first day of February
saw the area in the grips of a genuine blizzard, with severe winds and
blinding snowstorms. It was the worst storm anyone could recall since
the winter of 1861-62. "The river is blocked, and passengers arrive from
the mouth of the Willamette, which point steamers from Portland reach
with difficulty. The ice blockade is a heavy one and will no doubt result
in the suspension of traffic on the entire river."
On Feb. 8th,
the Register's headline shouted, "KING WINTER - Still in Possession of
the Italy of America'." The river was still blocked and several parties
solved the problem of being cut off - by crossing the river on the ice.
It was remarked that Jerome Smith was still " Out with his stages, even
if they are mounted on runners."
On the 15th,
the river was still clogged with ice and the ferry had not resumed any
of the trips on her route yet. Finally, on the 28th, the ice had dislodged
enough that the ferry began making regular trips. These harsh winter storms
played havoc with the rivers, and spring flooding after the meltoff made
the ferries' jobs very difficult - if not impossible. Often, during high
water, two ferryboats were needed. The severe flood of May and June, 1894,
stood the Columbia at 4 feet, three inches above an 1876 high water mark
and on June 6th showed no signs of stopping. Locals worried that, "Two
feet more rise brings the water into every store on Main Street up to
5th, then all will be in it...The condition of affairs in this city is
indeed deplorable."
The flood badly
wrecked the Portland and Vancouver railroad trestle and it would have
to be completely rebuilt. The last trip over the trestle by the electric
cars was made on May 31st, and the ferry came up and tied to the trees
in one local's yard. The flood also wrecked a large part of the elevated
wagon road of the P &V road on the bottoms and the balance was under water.
The entire road would have to be rebuilt and the teams could not cross
for several months, cutting down on ferry loads. But the ferry still had
plenty of work ahead of her carrying supplies for rebuilding back and
forth.
The ruinous consequences
of the flooding didn't stop the local humorists from finding the light
side of the situation, and even the Independent got into the act: "Everything
has floated off some of the bottom farms except the mortgages that were
on them. Nothing of that kind gets away."
"Railroad boxcars
commenced going down the river on Saturday evening, and it was no use
to set the brakes on them either." "Every boat between this city and Portland
is crowded with people who ride to see how high the water is in that other
drowned out town. Some other person's town is always deepest in it, and
they want to see it.
The old timers
have quit talking about the flood of 1876, which is a back number, and
are now and then referring to the time when steamboats landed at the snow
line on Mount Hood. As usual the newcomers don't believe it."
Sense of humor
of not, the city was greatly frustrated at continually having transportation
problems between Vancouver and Portland, as it was again in Jan., 1895,
when another snow storm hit. They desperately desired a permanent structure
across the Columbia and the Register of Dec. 28, 1892, voiced the bold
opinion that, "Vancouver will bid defiance to ice blockade when the big
steel bridge is built."
|